I guess it depends on what your skin wants. If you like a little luminous glow, Armani but if you want that dewiness then I would suggest HL. They’re both great! I’ll be the counterpoint and say I HATED Haus Labs. I loved the color match but nothing I did made it work for my skin. However, the only reason I use Armani over NLR is because Luminous Silk is the only foundation that won’t cling to my dry patches. If you’re not struggling with dry patches, Nars Light Reflecting may work very well for you. You can get a sample at Sephora to see how the formulas compare. Definitely not a dupe. It lasts better on my oily areas, while looking naturally glowy on both oily and dry areas. ruetherae. • 6 mo. ago. I haven’t tried Haus labs, but did not like the Armani that much 😢. It just sat on my skin and settled into fine lines etc and never looked good on me. I feel like it also exaggerated any texture on my face. Jul 12, 2015 · Of my two most recent foundation acquisitions, I infinitely prefer YSL Le Teint Touche Éclat to Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk. On the plus side, and perhaps because it's drier/more matte on me than moisturising/dewy, I do find it to be longer lasting on the skin and not as oily as other foundations I favour (e.g. NARS Sheer Glow, YSL Le Teint Jun 26, 2023 · Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Perfect Glow Oil-Free Foundation $69 at Sephora $50 at Walmart $69 at Nordstrom Folks with oily skin know all too well that the line between looking glowy and greasy is Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation contains 35 ingredients. INCI: Water , Cyclopentasiloxane , Glycerin Brilliant! , Isododecane , Alcohol Denatured , Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate , Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone , Hexyl Laurate and 27 more (Show all) .

armani luminous silk foundation review oily skin